Terug naar Encyclopedie

Review After Final Judgment: Exceptions to Res Judicata

Review is an exceptional legal procedure following finality, governed by Article 457 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. New facts may lead to a retrial, subject to strict conditions for concrete evidence. This protects against errors without undermining legal certainty. (48 words)

2 min leestijd

What is Review in Criminal Law?

Review is an extraordinary legal procedure available after a decision has become final. According to Article 457 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CCP), the Supreme Court may review a final judgment if new facts or evidence emerge that demonstrate the innocence of the convicted person or establish criminal liability in the case of a prior acquittal.

This remedy is strictly regulated to safeguard legal certainty. A request for review must contain concrete and new evidence, such as a false witness statement or DNA material that was not previously available. The procedure commences with the Supreme Court, which decides whether a review will take place.

Conditions and Procedure

Key conditions are that the evidence could not have been known earlier and directly impacts the judgment. The procedure consists of two phases: the granting of the request and a new substantive hearing. Successful reviews may result in acquittal, sentence reduction, or a new sentence.

Review illustrates that finality is not absolute but provides a safety net against miscarriages of justice. In practice, only a few cases lead to review each year, underscoring its exceptional nature.

Consequences of Review

Following a review, the execution of the sentence may be suspended. Convicted individuals are entitled to compensation if detained unjustly. This mechanism strengthens confidence in the criminal justice system.

(Word count: 198)